|
WorkFlow - Advanced Management Analysis Tool
|
|
|
|
WorkFlow is a revolutionary software tool that offers a unique approach to the
management and execution of the shipbuilding process. By using system dynamics modeling and simulation techniques
combined with object oriented programming techniques, WorkFlow offers users the
ability to plan and manage large, complex projects and realistically simulate
their performance over time. With the
simulation capability, users can determine the state of the project at any
point in time for a project’s duration. Moreover, users can alter project plans quickly and easily, re-run
simulations, and gain new insights into why the changes produce better or worse
results than the original project plan.
|
|
|
- Creates a structured theory of the production process that will allow managers to successfully develop a strategic plan by integrating and managing the multitude of functions that are key to the production process,
- Provides an operational methodology for testing present decision choices against the combined knowledge of the past in order to discover the most effective means of achieving production objectives, and
- Furnishes new insights into system behavior and fosters growth in the wisdom of program managers and design engineers so that the quality of management decision-making improves.
|
|
|
|
WorkFlow
represents a new generation of analytical tools, made possible by advances in
simulation science. This introductory
chapter explains the methodology that underlies WorkFlow. Subsequent chapters explain how to use
WorkFlow to build and operate powerful models.
|
|
|
|
What You Can Do with WorkFlow
|
|
|
|
You can use WorkFlow to explore not only real changes and events but also
"what-if?" assumptions and actions. By defining a series of "what-if?" scenarios, you could
continue comparing the relative impact of many different variables on system
behavior. For example, alternative work
schedules, task sequences, labor resources, problem areas and additional
management responses could all be quickly tested in a search for the best
solution.
|
|
|
|
The results you can achieve from simulating with WorkFlow include:
|
|
|
|
- Realistic project schedules, budgets, and design objectives,
- Lowered development costs and reduced development schedules, and
- Greater assurance that the plans are correct and that risks are reduced to a minimum.
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically, WorkFlow is a sophisticated computer simulation model capable of:
|
|
|
- Establishing a realistic project schedule for any production effort,
- Determining the likely impact of design/production changes or work related problems, and
- Identifying the optimal set of management actions to improve results.
|
|
|
|
The WorkFlow model traces the consequences
of cost and schedule of such "what-if?" scenarios as information delays, work
quality, design/production changes and personnel shifts. The model assists program managers and
design engineers in planning and managing effective resource allocation among
multiple tasking within integrated product and process development teams. The program includes a graphic interface
that permits users to define and simulate any number of "what-if?"
alternatives to help determine the optimal course of action throughout the
entire design and production process.
|
|
|
|
Problems with Current Approaches to Project Management
|
|
|
|
Most
project management tools allow you to define the work breakdown for a project
(i.e., all its individual work elements and the connections among the work
elements) and assign resources to each work element. With these capabilities, you are able to plan a project and know
what resources are needed throughout the project.
|
|
|
|
Some
tools allow you to indicate the availability of resources over the duration of
the project. Then, the tools simulate
the matching of available resources to required resources for the project. If a resource is not available when a work
element requires it, the work element is forced to wait until the resource is
available. This simulation capability
adds some realism to the project plan by showing where available resources do
not meet the resource requirements and what the impacts are on the project.
|
|
|
|
However, even with the improved realism of
this resource simulation capability, current project management tools still
force you to make many assumptions that prove erroneous and have a great impact
on project performance. For instance,
you may input that a certain task will take 40 hours and will require five
people. What happens when only four
people are available? Does work still
get done? Also, what happens when ten
people are available? Do only five
people work, or can the task take advantage of the extra people? If the work task falls behind schedule,
should the people work overtime? If so,
how much? Will their productivity
suffer if the people are forced to work overtime for extended periods?
|
|
|
|
About WorkFlow
|
|
|
|
WorkFlow captures both
the essential physical activities and the essential management decision-making
activities that support the production process. WorkFlow provides a baseline for exploring the cost and schedule
impacts of alternative designs, changes in work rates and management decisions.
|
|
|
|
WorkFlow is the first application of the production
process embodied in a dynamic interactive simulation model. By capturing the complex set of feedback
interrelationships that drive dynamic behavior, WorkFlow is capable of
quantifying manhour cost and schedule tradeoffs, tracking changes in productivity
due to internal and external conditions, and tracing the impact of schedule
pressure on overall cost and schedule. The program also enables program managers to test alternative contract
change decisions and come to agreement on which actions produce the most
desirable results. For example, it
could well turn out that a mix of both schedule acceleration for some tasks
coupled with a schedule extension for other tasks offers the best
tradeoff. Without a simulation model to
test the alternatives, program managers would be hard-pressed to decide which
action to choose and equally hard-pressed to justify their decision should
subsequent events prove them wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|